TradeLane

In a May 29 filing, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) confirmed its intent to appeal the US Court of International Trade (CIT)’s sweeping order requiring refunds of IEEPA duties. The government’s central argument is that the CIT exceeded its authority by directing refunds for entries that are “finally liquidated”—generally those more than 90 days past liquidation—particularly for importers that have not filed suit.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has activated the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), creating a formal path for importers to seek refunds of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). While CAPE is designed to streamline and consolidate refunds, importers retain key responsibilities that must be addressed before any refund can be issued.

Understanding and preparing for those responsibilities is critical to avoiding delays and missed recoveries.

 What Happened

On March 6, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued an order in Atmus Filtration, Inc. v. United States that temporarily pauses U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) from taking immediate action to remove or refund tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

 On March 4^th, the US Court of International Trade (CIT) ordered that unliquidated entries entered subject to IEEPA duties be liquidated without regard to IEEPA duties, and liquidated entries where liquidation is not final be reliquidated without regard to IEEPA duties.  

On February 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling invalidating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) as a mechanism to levy tariffs. While the tariffs are invalidated and stopped being collected on February 24^th at 12:01 AM, the ruling did not provide operational clarity for importers seeking refunds of IEEPA duties already paid.